Back in November 2009 after the first ever tranche of emails were released, I wrote the following:
So then. Somebody hacks into one of the mailservers of the University of East Anglia and downloads huge chunks of data including all the mail from the last few years. Once released into the public domain and protected by being replicated and distributed around the internet planet we discover that in truth the whole climate change global warming industry is founded on a lie.
Global Warming is man-made, yep, MAN-MADE-UP!
Emails not only reveal how very prominent ‘scientists’ are swapping and changing data in order to make it work to support the idea that a) there is global warming and b) it is as a result of human activity, but they reveal how a concerted campaign of denigration and abuse along with deliberate pressure is being waged against any scientists publishing models from the data that show no warming. There’s even crowing and celebration when one of their opponents dies. There’s also evidence of cover-ups with commands that emails be deleted (to avoid it being available under the Freedom of Information Act). Plus, of course, they refuse to share the raw data from which they have made-up their alarmist figures.
Considering that the whole climate change industry is costing the planet a fortune to fund and that we have been so indoctrinated with this complete lie, you’d think that it would be a scandal far greater than revelation of what bogus expenses were being claimed by MPs and that the media would be all over it.
But, and here’s where it’s all a bit weird, all the BBC News website has about it is little bits of ‘how terrible that this server was hacked and emails were stolen’, skirting completely over what the earth shattering contents reveal of the global warming conspiracy and lie.
Why?
Who has so much control over the media that they are trying and succeeding to kill this story? Whoever it is they are far more powerful than the MPs, most of whom were exposed for their dodgy dealings. If the silencing of the BBC came from the ‘House’ then none of the MP expenses row would have got to air. So who is more powerful than the Government of this country that they’ve managed to stop the BBC reporting this more fully?
I think we should be told!
But wait. Another burning question is why the lie?
Money. Big huge money.
It’s about money. Firstly, the ‘scientists’ need money in order to continue to propagate the scare stories and apportion blame at the feet of humanity. By altering the data to comply with this, they of course secure their own futures. And of course, their money comes from the massive climate change industry, which in turn comes from us.
Some people see this as a massive global conspiracy the size of a ‘New World Order’. Is it? Would that be why the BBC and ‘British Media’ are being very silent?
I think we should be told!
The ‘scientists’ that strongly oppose the ‘warmists’ are also usually being paid for by the oil companies and powers-that-be that find their (financial) existence threatened by the green lobby, so they can be just as bad as those making us think the world is about to end, but are they the ones silencing the BBC?
Nope.
So, who the heck can we trust with this data? We really are at the mercy of the camp that shouts the loudest or seems the most convincing, rather than provides the real truth.
It would seem that at best nothing is happening to our climate other than whatever cycles it goes through anyway; at worst something might be happening but we’re far far away from identifying what it might be and why. To even start to blame humanity is even further away. Yet, some people love to think humanity is to blame. They love to hit themselves with birch twigs and wail about how terrible we are as a species.
Ordinary people say, “Ah, well it’s plain to see that climate is changing. Look at what we see on the news.”
Hmmmm. Don’t forget you have not observed any of this first hand. All you have access to now is far more instant and accurate reporting of ‘events’ than people ever had even 50 years ago, let alone 5,000 years ago.
It is possible the events are much as they always were, but just previously unrecorded or not very accurately recorded by humans. Weather patterns have always shifted and swapped about. At one time there were centuries of heat and correspondingly grapes being grown on the Thames, at another time it would freeze over and people could have parties on it.
However, from our media we are drip fed ‘conclusions’ along with high definition close-ups of these more recent events, so what you think you see might not actually be what you think you see.
What’s the real truth?
I really really think we should be told!
England's England 