History is a very strange reality. You’d kind of imagine ‘history’ was based on facts, based on the records of the time, based on the truth, and was set in stone. Well, it clearly isn’t.
History is often re-written. Who recalls the hundreds of thousands of Pounds spent on going through historical minutes of meetings to re-write out anything which might have been considered in more enlightened times as sexist or racist?
Today is of course recorded by video, so we can’t change the actuality. However, we can dead easily change the ‘intent’. This is clearly demonstrated by how the Guardian newspaper will present a story compared to how the Daily Mail newspaper will present the same story. Each has an agenda to follow, and so each will change the interpretation of what is clearly visible, in order to suit their agenda. The truth? Well, it’s lost in translation.
Before the modern video or film era, of course, entire ‘truths’ could be re-written countless times to suit a purpose. Entire stories and ‘legends’ were so easily invented and then taught as if they were historical facts. I don’t just mean the tales of heroism about those who, in truth, were not heroes, or tales of barbarism about those who, in truth, were not barbaric, but whole tales of humans who were then levitated to being god-heads, and have whole religious beliefs based around them, like Christianity.
History is never really what happened.
And so this is true within the global warming religion.
Put in very basic terms, every so often different custodians of temperature records come out with ‘another’ set of those temperature records. For reasons that make no real sense, they keep revising down the historical temperatures.
Despite these being a matter of paper record, and so, say, the temperature on a certain day in 1897 in a certain location having originally been recorded as, say, 17 degrees, when this gets included onto the digital records, it will have changed to, say, 15 degrees.
After a few years, new figures will come out and, surprise surprise, the 1897 figure for that exact day and location will have reduced even further, to, say, 13 degrees.
This ‘homogenisation’, we are told, is necessary in order to reflect the errors of the instruments of measurement of the day, and to generate the true figure.
Yeah right, let’s ‘join the dots’ to reveal the truth.
The actual truth behind the constant need to keep revising ancient temperature records downwards is so that a trend line travelling upwards to warmer current temperatures can be maintained. The more that it cools (as it has consistently over the last 15 years), the more they have to re-write history in order to maintain the ‘warming trend’ that they so want us to believe we are to blame for.
It’s a fascinating fact that if they just left history alone, and published the true trend graphs for temperature records, the public would easily see that despite us continuing to bellow out carbon dioxide at an increasing rate, the world is now cooling, not warming, and all the global warming industry’s previous predictions of Armageddon have failed.
History is being deliberately re-written in front of us, in order to continue the global warming meme and the Billions of Dollars of investment in ‘investigation’ that it generates for those that follow and shout loudly about its associated religion. Why aren’t we protesting?
England's England 