Forget the bedroom tax, evict them all!

I’m not sure which phrase is becoming the more annoying, ‘bedroom tax’ or social housing’.

(A typical bedroom inside some ‘social housing’)

In the first place, ‘social housing’ stock tends to be far younger and in a much greater state of repair than privately owned housing.  That’s certainly the case when it’s privately owned but rented out. Those unlucky enough to not be gifted with ‘social housing’ but having to rent from the private sector end up paying so much more for so much less.

For the lucky ones living in ‘social housing’ the standard of living is fantastic. Extremely cheap subsidised rent, all the latest appliances, free treatments and updates to windows, central heating, insulation, etc., etc.

Meanwhile, those renting privately get no such luxuries.  Even less so for those who privately own (or mortgage) their own home.

In so many respects, ‘social housing’ is for the very privileged in society.

The overwhelming majority of the occupants of ‘social housing’ are also receiving handouts of ‘Universal Credit’ from the State (i.e the rest of us) to help them live reasonably good lives, including being able to afford drugs, booze, cigarettes, Sky TV, the latest Games and as many takeaways as they can fit into their bulging stomachs. Indeed, unlike normal people they don’t even have to worry about the money coming into their account and then having to pay it back out to cover their bills.  It’s all done automagically for them so they don’t have to lift a finger. Well, lift a finger beyond lifting a spliff to their mouths.

So, it is a reasonable ask that where the free house is huge and only has one or two people in it, that they downsize into a house more suited to their needs, releasing their current one for bigger and more needy families.

A couple living in a four or five bedroomed house is unfair.  Meanwhile, a couple with four or five children currently trying to fit into a two bedroomed house, actually need the bigger house.

It seems perfectly right and proper to ask those in houses too big for them, to either move to one more suitable or to pay extra for the additional rooms they don’t need.  However, what we now have is a lot of ‘bleating’ and whining, and band-wagon jumping about what they’ve dubbed the ‘bedroom tax’.

Nope.  It’s not a ‘bedroom tax’.  It’s a ‘selfish bastard’ tax.

The socialist elite who would rather that everybody lived in mansions provided for them by, well, by ‘magic’ (they never quite explain how anything should ever be paid for).  The near-guaranteed, somewhat smaller ‘social housing’ which so many are taught is their birthright is the next best thing.

And it is simply because the lazy scum that normally infest ‘social housing’ believe the socialist lie that they should have something for nothing, that they are now bleating and screaming about the ‘bedroom tax’.

Isn’t it time we just threw these ‘selfish bastards’ out on the streets?

One comment

  1. I agree with all of this. This is no 'bedroom tax' its a reduction of benefits. Yes these selfish scroungers should be thrown out on the streets and made to pay a rent or mortgage like most of us. To do this they will have to cancel the sky tv and go out a get a job!

    Like

Comments are closed.