You know these context-sensitive adverts you get to see around things you read on the net? You know. If you are reading about cats, then the ads will be about cats. Those ads. Well, here’s a question:
How come any article you read about Climate and Climate Change is always surrounded by ads for products or services promoting the idea that man is to blame for Global Warming and spending your money will help save the world? You never get targeted with ads from organisations holding a more sceptical view.
The answer is that, just as any Christian Evangelist will tell you, there is huge money to be made from getting people to believe in the ‘Man-Made’ Climate Change religion. There’s no money to be made from promoting the truth or from casting doubt or a sceptical eye on the claims of those who believe that man is to blame for something, anything, and the world is facing catastrophe.
That’s why there’s no advertising campaigns funded by the ‘there’s nothing to worry about’ camp. The big money is backing the religion because it can make money and exert control and power over people.
In contrast, scepticism is mainly very poor and underfunded. There’s no money to be made in saying that mankind probably isn’t to blame for anything.
Religion is never happy with people who reject or question it. The Middle-Eastern originating religions such as Christianity are full of threats and nastiness towards those who are not ‘believers’. At the very least ‘non-believers’ will ‘burn in hell for eternity’. Nice people.
Recently the Global Warming religion has had its evangelists out and screaming insults at non-believers. Top of the gravy-train money-tree is Al Gore. He kindly branded sceptics as due the same treatment as ‘racists’.
Now then, ‘racism’ is the somewhat irrational hatred of a person based on their skin colour or their country of origin, and the subsequent bad treatment of them. Meanwhile ‘scepticism’ is the never blindly accepting of anything and always being open to re-examine accepted norms. By its very nature, ‘science’ is the constant re-examination and logical re-testing of ‘things’ and ‘ideas’. Science is scepticism in action. Once science becomes closed and no longer sceptical and challenging, it changes into ‘faith’.
Religions hate science and see it as an enemy, and will pour scorn and derision on scientists and the scientific way of examining things to make sense of them. The religion of man-made Global Warming hates sceptics who dare to want proof and to apply logic before they support the wild claims that humans are in some way responsible for warming temperatures because we produce waste Carbon Dioxide (plant food).
Religions don’t like being challenged, and those who challenge the ‘faith’ become victims of attack. Years ago sceptics were routinely tortured to death. Today it’s verbal insults.
Yet, despite the opposition from those of the ‘faith’, the science continues to examine how the climate works and more and more nails are being put into the coffin of the ‘faith’ that humans are to blame for something.
Even so, the ‘faithful’ just won’t waver from their irrational beliefs, any more than the Pope will admit to a lack of belief in a god.
And then along came CERN and their CLOUD experiment.
Recently, CERN, those behind the Large Hadron Collider, published the results of some experiments, which more or less re-enforced the theory that climate and climate change was mainly under the control of cosmic rays, or in other words, controlled by the Sun. This theory is gathering more and more evidence to support it.
Mainstream media, such as the Guardian controlled BBC, continues with the ‘given’ that the world is warming and we are to blame and so we must be charged a fortune for energy and penalised if we dare emit any Carbon Dioxide, even though there is no evidence whatsoever of any connection between what we belch out and how warm the climate is. Experiments such as the CLOUD experiment from CERN are an inconvenience to their mantras and are therefore ignored and hidden from the general public. Even the director of CERN asked the scientists concerned to be very careful about how they presented their findings, saying he was fearful of the political repercussions. No doubt pressure would be applied to remove his funding and try to shut CERN down.
I guess it’s a bit like somehow conducting an experiment that proves beyond any doubt that there is no god. It would be inconvenient for this to get out, and so all efforts are made by those who wish to control us via their religion to silence or rubbish it.
This is why they are so desperate to silence any dissent, and will swiftly act against those who have logic and the results of experiments that show that man actually isn’t to blame for anything. It would mean they would be losing control over us and their massive incomes from us.
Remember how they treated Galileo Galilei who basically said the earth was round and everything circled around the Sun? That’s right, they tortured him and kept him locked up for the rest of his life.
We can’t let history repeat itself, we have to free ourselves from those who want to keep the truth from us, and want to promote the ‘faith’ of man-made climate change. We now know that for them and their irrational ‘faith’ it’s game over.
England's England 